<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Joel&#8217;s Wasabi: not a bad idea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.losingfight.com/blog/2006/09/02/joels-wasabi-not-a-bad-idea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.losingfight.com/blog/2006/09/02/joels-wasabi-not-a-bad-idea/</link>
	<description>making matt mullenweg regret his role as an enabler</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 07:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: todd</title>
		<link>http://www.losingfight.com/blog/2006/09/02/joels-wasabi-not-a-bad-idea/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 14:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.losingfight.com/blog/2006/09/02/joels-wasabi-not-a-bad-idea/#comment-168</guid>
		<description>Finally!

This is the first time I've really heard this argument, which is sad because it really gets to the issue.

Regardless of how FogBugz is developed, it is a PHP/VBScript VS Ruby on Rails scenario -- NOT a Wasabi VS Ruby on Rails scenario.

In fact, Fog Creek's abstraction is genuis because it allows them to target multiple platforms from one intermediate language which provides the greatest flexibility in thier system.  Should language blah become really mature and stable, they can just target their compiler to blah and create a blah version for clients.

(Of course this doesn't mean he isn't egotistical and high on himself, but that's another argument entirely.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally!</p>
<p>This is the first time I&#8217;ve really heard this argument, which is sad because it really gets to the issue.</p>
<p>Regardless of how FogBugz is developed, it is a PHP/VBScript VS Ruby on Rails scenario &#8212; NOT a Wasabi VS Ruby on Rails scenario.</p>
<p>In fact, Fog Creek&#8217;s abstraction is genuis because it allows them to target multiple platforms from one intermediate language which provides the greatest flexibility in thier system.  Should language blah become really mature and stable, they can just target their compiler to blah and create a blah version for clients.</p>
<p>(Of course this doesn&#8217;t mean he isn&#8217;t egotistical and high on himself, but that&#8217;s another argument entirely.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.losingfight.com/blog/2006/09/02/joels-wasabi-not-a-bad-idea/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2006 10:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.losingfight.com/blog/2006/09/02/joels-wasabi-not-a-bad-idea/#comment-141</guid>
		<description>I agree Joel is just a troll, he uses his blog to advertise his (crappy) bug tracking software. 

Wasabi just doesn't make sense at all. He already has a PHP version, PHP scales (according to him), PHP works on windows, PHP works with IIS, PHP works with SQL server.

What's the problem? Why bother with a compiler when you already have a cross platform, scalable, enterprise software?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Joel is just a troll, he uses his blog to advertise his (crappy) bug tracking software. </p>
<p>Wasabi just doesn&#8217;t make sense at all. He already has a PHP version, PHP scales (according to him), PHP works on windows, PHP works with IIS, PHP works with SQL server.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the problem? Why bother with a compiler when you already have a cross platform, scalable, enterprise software?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bleh</title>
		<link>http://www.losingfight.com/blog/2006/09/02/joels-wasabi-not-a-bad-idea/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>bleh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2006 00:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.losingfight.com/blog/2006/09/02/joels-wasabi-not-a-bad-idea/#comment-139</guid>
		<description>look at what joel has done to the internet. he's a fucking troll, and a good one, regardless of what you think of his argument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>look at what joel has done to the internet. he&#8217;s a fucking troll, and a good one, regardless of what you think of his argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.729 seconds -->
