Comments on: Top Ten OS X Screensavers — Rigged or just Biased?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:11:56 +0000

LOL, if this is sarcasm. LOL, if it isn’t.

By: alex

alex — Mon, 03 Sep 2007 10:12:23 +0000

This whole screensaver business is mafia controlled–always has been. X-Screensavers, which is so clear the best, was left completely off “The List”–if that doesn’t prove CIA cover-up, then i don’t know what does.

By: Aaron

Aaron — Tue, 29 May 2007 06:09:00 +0000

I love how nobody has a sense of sarcasm.

By: Roger Crullen

Roger Crullen — Sun, 18 Feb 2007 12:36:40 +0000

dude, you sound like you’re in a lover’s quarrel with Phil. your attack on Phil’s comment that the aquarium screensaver is an oldie is just pure nonsense, your argument totally childish.

By: CoffeeBuzzard

CoffeeBuzzard — Sat, 06 Jan 2007 10:10:23 +0000

Hey, so I just found out that the big scary Angler Fish in Finding Nemo was a girl fish! No Kidding!! The boy Angler Fish is just this tiny little thing that sneaks up on the Big Girl Angler Fish, bites her, hangs on and then freakin’ melts into her over time! No kidding! Then when the Big Girl Angler Fish is ready to have little Baby Angler Fish, the little nub of what’s left of the Boy Angler Fish is ready and waiting with it’s … genetic material!! WhoooAAAHow!! Shew.

Put that in Marine Aquarium and I’ll pay you $22.75.

By: Max

Max — Tue, 26 Dec 2006 21:20:58 +0000

you made a whole post to rip on another post for being biased? did you notice that you ended your post with a blatant advertisement for your readers to BUY a screensaver from YOU? what a joke.

By: Tim Andersen

Tim Andersen — Thu, 07 Dec 2006 04:19:47 +0000

I am with you on this Andy. I wouldn’t use half of the screen savers that Phill listed if you paid me to. Well done on marine aquarium! How about an updated version some time with some other sea creatures to mesmerize us.

By: Ranjeet Sodhi

Ranjeet Sodhi — Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:30:54 +0000

I personally would never pay for a screen saver; especially given that Mac OS X already comes pre-installed with a large number of very nice screen savers. Additionally, there are a larger number of really good screen savers to be had for free.

I am sure you put a lot of work into the screen saver you designed, and are entitled to charge whatever amount you deem appropriate. That said, the market typically decides if the price for a product is right or wrong (they simply don’t buy things that they consider are expensive). To some you screen saver may be worth the price, to many others it isn’t (Please note: this isn’t a dig at the author of this screen saver).

By: Michael Babin

Michael Babin — Fri, 04 Aug 2006 18:13:43 +0000

Anything posted anonymously is a waste of storage space and electricity.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 04 Aug 2006 04:58:53 +0000

> Finally, Phill implies that $20 is a steep price to pay for a screensaver.

$20 for a screensaver is a waste of money.